Confusion about Zero Trust is making it harder to implement
As we detailed in our business case exploring the Zero Trust, at its core, ZT is a concept and shift in how organizations approach the idea of security and data privacy.
It’s not one product or piece of software, rather an approach that assumes breach and secures your organization by requiring users prove they are who they say they are and be granted gated access accordingly.
As explained in a recent article from WIRED, “What is Zero Trust” the approach eliminates the old moat & castle networking model and instead of trusting particular devices and assuming what’s inside your walls are safe, a Zero Trust methodology uses verification, network segmentation and least privilege to protect the enterprise.
Under the old model, all the computers, servers, and other devices physically in an office building were on the same network and trusted each other. Your work computer could connect to the printer on your floor or find team documents on a shared server. Tools like firewalls and antivirus were set up to view anything outside the organization as bad;everything inside the network didn’t merit much scrutiny.
However, the explosion of mobile devices, cloud services,and remote/hybrid work have radically challenged those assumptions. Organizations can’t physically control every device its employees use anymore. And even if they could, once an attacker slipped by perimeter defenses, the network would instantly grant them a lot of trust and freedom. “Outside bad, inside good.”
“Zero Trust is a concept, not an action.”
Ken Westin, Security Researcher
Instead of trusting particular devices or connections from certain places, Zero Trust demands that people prove they are who they claim and should therefore be granted access. Typically, that means logging into a corporate account with biometrics or a hardware security key in addition to usernames and passwords to make it harder for attackers to impersonate users. And even once someone gets through, it’s on a need-to-know or need-to-access basis. If you don’t invoice contractors as part of your job, your corporate account shouldn’t tie into the billing platform.
Zero Trust isn’t a single piece of software you can install or a box you can check, but a philosophy, a set of concepts, a mantra,a mindset.
You still must implement things like device and software inventory, network segmentation, access controls.
Confusion about the real meaning and purpose of Zero Trust makes it harder for people to implement the ideas in practice. Proponents are largely in agreement about the overall goals and purpose behind the phrase, but busy executives or IT admins with other things to worry about can easily be led astray and end up implementing security protections that simply reinforce old approaches rather than ushering in something new.
Here at OWG, we work with our partner clients and help them engineer a true Zero Trust methodology throughout their IT ecosystem. If you have questions or would like to see if we can help your organization better protect its most critical data, email email@example.com or click here to set a time to speak.i